<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ang wastong gamit ng &#8216;ng&#8217; at &#8216;nang&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/</link>
	<description>Just another language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 05:00:22 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: edic piano</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>edic piano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-254</guid>
		<description>makabuluhan at nakatutulong ng malawi ang inyong website. congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>makabuluhan at nakatutulong ng malawi ang inyong website. congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glaiza</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>glaiza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-253</guid>
		<description>min min ang tamang sagot eh ala una nang hapon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>min min ang tamang sagot eh ala una nang hapon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: min min</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>min min</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-252</guid>
		<description>gusto ko sanang makumpirma kung paano to sasabihin:
&quot;ala una ng hapon o ala una nang hapon...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gusto ko sanang makumpirma kung paano to sasabihin:<br />
&#8220;ala una ng hapon o ala una nang hapon&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yearly perez</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>yearly perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Ang nang ay karaniwang ginagamit na pangatnig sa mga hugnayang pangunngusap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ang nang ay karaniwang ginagamit na pangatnig sa mga hugnayang pangunngusap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menie</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Menie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Sabi ni Ka Ezzard: &quot;Nang makatulog ng mahimbing, nangyari ang insidente.&quot;

Sabi ni Tata Rauls:  &quot;makatulog NANG mahimbing&quot;

Tama dito si Tata Rauls.  Ang sinasaad na alituntunin ni Ka Ezzard na ang &quot;ng&quot; ay ginagamit pag ang kasunod na salita ay pang-uri ay hindi akma sa kanyang halimbawa sapagkat ang &quot;mahimbing&quot; ay tumutukoy sa isang pandiwa (makatulog) at hindi sa isang pangngalan.  Samakatwid, sa kasong ito, ang &quot;mahimbing&quot; ay isang pang-abay at hindi pang-uri.

Noong nag-aaral ako ng balarila, ang tinuro sa amin ay ang &quot;nang&quot; ay ginagamit sa simula ng praseng pang-abay.  Maliban diyan, tama rin na ito ay ang katumbas ng &quot;na&quot; at hulaping &quot;-ng&quot;.  Samantala, ang &quot;ng&quot; ay isang pantukoy at ginagamit pag ang kasunod na salita ay pangngalan.  Kung may pang-uri na nauuna sa pangngalan, siempre &quot;ng&quot; pa rin ang gagamitin, dahil ito ay tumutukoy pa rin sa pangngalan.  Hal:  &quot;ng babae&quot;, &quot;ng magandang babae&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabi ni Ka Ezzard: &#8220;Nang makatulog ng mahimbing, nangyari ang insidente.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sabi ni Tata Rauls:  &#8220;makatulog NANG mahimbing&#8221;</p>
<p>Tama dito si Tata Rauls.  Ang sinasaad na alituntunin ni Ka Ezzard na ang &#8220;ng&#8221; ay ginagamit pag ang kasunod na salita ay pang-uri ay hindi akma sa kanyang halimbawa sapagkat ang &#8220;mahimbing&#8221; ay tumutukoy sa isang pandiwa (makatulog) at hindi sa isang pangngalan.  Samakatwid, sa kasong ito, ang &#8220;mahimbing&#8221; ay isang pang-abay at hindi pang-uri.</p>
<p>Noong nag-aaral ako ng balarila, ang tinuro sa amin ay ang &#8220;nang&#8221; ay ginagamit sa simula ng praseng pang-abay.  Maliban diyan, tama rin na ito ay ang katumbas ng &#8220;na&#8221; at hulaping &#8220;-ng&#8221;.  Samantala, ang &#8220;ng&#8221; ay isang pantukoy at ginagamit pag ang kasunod na salita ay pangngalan.  Kung may pang-uri na nauuna sa pangngalan, siempre &#8220;ng&#8221; pa rin ang gagamitin, dahil ito ay tumutukoy pa rin sa pangngalan.  Hal:  &#8220;ng babae&#8221;, &#8220;ng magandang babae&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Mahirap ba talagang magsulat ng komento nang hindi gumagamit ng &quot;taglish&quot;?

Tama po ba ang pagkakagamit ko ng &quot;ng&quot; at &quot;nang?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahirap ba talagang magsulat ng komento nang hindi gumagamit ng &#8220;taglish&#8221;?</p>
<p>Tama po ba ang pagkakagamit ko ng &#8220;ng&#8221; at &#8220;nang?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosell villariba</title>
		<link>http://taglish.org/ang-wastong-gamit-ng-ng-at-nang/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>rosell villariba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taglish.org/?p=166#comment-245</guid>
		<description>hi, ako mas madali kong naintidihan ang explanation ni Ka Ezzard as oppose to the explanation of Tata Raul... Ka Ezzard&#039;s explanatio is to elementary as in he discusses it in layman&#039;s term. as with tata raul&#039;s he discusses it in somewhat technical in which people like that doesn&#039;t use or practice filipino grammar find hard to understand the technical explanations. so, for me ka ezzard&#039;s way of informing the reader is so eefective and easy understand as well as to remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, ako mas madali kong naintidihan ang explanation ni Ka Ezzard as oppose to the explanation of Tata Raul&#8230; Ka Ezzard&#8217;s explanatio is to elementary as in he discusses it in layman&#8217;s term. as with tata raul&#8217;s he discusses it in somewhat technical in which people like that doesn&#8217;t use or practice filipino grammar find hard to understand the technical explanations. so, for me ka ezzard&#8217;s way of informing the reader is so eefective and easy understand as well as to remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
